NOTES ON DEATH IN VENICE
Chapter 1 (1840-43)
Von Aschenbach is taking a
walk through Munich when we first meet him, and ends up reading the headstones
in stonemasons' shops. His work, which
is that of a writer, demands "particular discretion, caution, penetration,
and precision of will" 1841). He is
a meticulous craftsman. The sight of a
foreign traveler, even if the man is hostile, provokes von Aschenbach into a
state of imagination and wanderlust. He
envisions tropical landscapes, primitive wildernesses and so forth (1841). He is left when this vision fades
successfully attempting to rationalize his need to travel somewhere beyond the
mountain "rustic country house" (1842) that has been his only retreat
over the years. He is aware of a
"growing lassitude, about which no one could be allowed to know"
(1842) and which must not be allowed to impact or diminish the value of his
meticulous work as a writer. He is a
perfectionist, and for this quality, we are told, "he had curbed and
cooled his emotions, because he knew that emotion inclines one to satisfaction
with a comfortable approximation, a half of perfection" (1842
bottom). He has attained mastery as a
writer, but even he feels that his work lacks "those earmarks of a fiery,
playful fancy" (1843) that his audience might appreciate even more than
perfection. So von Aschenbach decides to
do some safe traveling for a month or so.
The stranger who prompted this decision is by now nowhere to be found.
Chapter 2 (1843, 48)
The picture that emerges of
von Aschenbach is that of a bourgeois intellectual whose art has grown
dignified and respectable with age, to the point where they're including him
now in the German educational system's equivalent of standard textbooks. He is the son of a civil servant and his
mother was a Bohemian music director's daughter (1843 bottom-44 top). The author describes von Aschenbach's
literary ascendancy in ideal terms, so that he seems like the very pattern of
success as a career or professional author.
He aims to please the general public as well as a younger and more
challenging audience. Again and again,
the author sets forth the strong work ethic of this writer: "he was not so
much born for constant exertion as he was called to it (1844 middle). He plans to live a long life so that his
writing me deal with all the phases of a long life. What he possesses is not so much what we
might call romantic genius as a Protestant work ethic imported into the realm
of artistic creation (1845 top). His own
watchword, we are told, is that "nearly everything achieving greatness did
so under the banner of 'Despite' – despite grief and suffering…" (1845
middle). There is a kind of passiveness
to his whole ethos, for which the author St. Sebastian the martyr. To me, the most significant passage in this
chapter is the following: "von Aschenbach was the poet of all those who
work on the edge of exhaustion, of the overburdened, worn down moralists of
achievement who nonetheless still stand tall, those who, stunted in growth and
short of means, use ecstatic feats of will and clever management to extract
from themselves at least for a period of time the effects of greatness"
(1846 top). It seems to me that this
sort of description damns von Aschenbach with faint praise. His sort of greatness so-called is the only
sort recognized by the mass of people he aims to please. Is the only sort recognized by his age,
apparently. That does not necessarily
make it a genuine greatness. This is
extremely clear towards the end of the first paragraph on 1846. What is one to say about an author whose
career can be summed up as a "defiant rise to dignity, beyond any twinge
of doubt and of irony that might have stood in his way" (1846 middle)?
Around the time we learn that
he is appearing in anthologies, we learn that he married only to have his wife
die young. He also has a daughter (18 47
3/4). At the end of the chapter, the
author explains the difference between art and other kinds of experience:
"Art offers a deeper happiness, but it consumes one more quickly. It engraves upon the faces of its servants
the traces of imaginary, mental adventures and… Engenders in them a nervous
sensitivity, and over-refinement, a weariness and an inquisitiveness such as are
scarcely ever produced by a life full of extravagant passions and
pleasures" (1848 top).
Chapter 3 (1848-66)
Von Aschenbach decides upon a
visit to Venice after he becomes disappointed with the Adriatic island he had
originally fixed on (1848). Venice is an
exotic and ancient place, and easy enough to get to for any European. An eminently logical decision on the part of
the good professor. But we are soon made
aware that this trip is not going to be a three-week tour, to borrow a line
from Gilligan's Island. The eerie
appearance of an old merrymaker unsettles von Aschenbach: "scarcely had
Aschenbach gotten a closer look at him when he realized with something like
horror that this youth was not genuine" (1849). The merrymaker is an elderly man dressed up
with the trappings of youth. He is inappropriate,
untimely. Wouldn't everyone around him
notice? Asks von Aschenbach to himself. "It seemed to him that things were
starting to take a turn away from the ordinary, as if a dreamy estrangement, a
bizarre distortion of the world were setting in…" (1850 top). Approaching Venice from the sea is a
remarkable sight, finds von Aschenbach, but with regard to that elderly
merrymaker, things only get more unsettling: the old fellow has had too much to
drink and can't hold his liquor, so he makes a perfect fool of himself with
obscene gestures and inappropriate gregariousness (1851 middle), which
culminates in some babbling about beloveds.
The affinity between this old reveler and von Aschenbach will, of
course, become ruefully apparent as the novella develops.
Von Aschenbach wants to go to
the steamer landing, but his squirrely gondolier is determined to take him to
the Lido because the steamer will not accept luggage. A contest of wills follows (1853-54). As soon as von Aschenbach lands and the
gondolier takes off without collecting his fee, we find out that he did not
have a license. Nothing is as it should
be; everything is "odd" (1855 top).
The narrator makes an interesting remark about the difference between
introspective people and ordinary people: "A lonely, quiet person has
observations and experiences that are at once both more indistinct and more
penetrating than those of one more gregarious; his thoughts are weightier,
stranger, and never without a tinge of sadness.
Images and perceptions that others might shrug off with a glance, a
laugh, or a brief conversation occupy him unduly, become profound in his
silence, become significant, become experience, adventure, emotion" (1854
bottom-55 top). This kind of distinction
should clue us in to the way Thomas Mann is going to treat conceptual
oppositions, neither simply approving nor condemning them.
Von Aschenbach soon takes his
fateful first glance at the young Polish boy with whom he will soon become
obsessed: "Aschenbach noted with astonishment that the boy was perfectly
beautiful. His face, pale and gracefully
reserved, was framed by honey-colored curls.
He had a straight nose and a lovely mouth and wore an expression of
exquisite, divine solemnity" (1855).
Already von Aschenbach is comparing him to Greek statues. It is not entirely certain whether this boy
is in poor health or simply pampered, but von Aschenbach, we are told, believes
the second hypothesis: "There is inborn in every artistic disposition an
indulgent and treacherous tendency to accept injustice when it produces beauty
and to respond with complicity and even admiration when the aristocrats of this
world get preferential treatment" (1856).
The immediate effect of this vision upon him is something like
intellectual stimulation, and von Aschenbach initially dismisses the whole
affair: he "ultimately concluded that his thoughts and discoveries
resembled those inspirations that come in dreams: they seem wonderful at the
time, but in the sober light of day they show up as utterly shallow and
useless" (1857 middle).
Nonetheless, his dreams seem disturbed after this initial meeting. It is at this point that we hear about the
stultifying, sultry and stagnant atmosphere in Venice, a phenomenon with which
von Aschenbach is familiar since he has been to Venice before and left the
place on account of the unhealthy weather.
Soon, von Aschenbach is
remarking upon "the truly godlike beauty possessed by this mortal
child" (1858 middle), and deciding that he will stay longer in spite of
the weather. The narrator lets us in on
the fact that von Aschenbach has always felt a love of the sea, thanks to its
indistinct and vague qualities. "It
was a forbidden affinity, directly contrary to his calling, and seductive
precisely for that reason" (1859).
That is, his cultivation of meticulous stylistic perfection as a writer
contrasts with his love of the immeasurable void. However, no sooner are we let in on this
insight than the void is traversed by none other than Tadzio: "the
horizontal line of the sea's edge was crossed by a human figure" (1859
middle). It is evident that the boy
can't stand the sight of a Russian family, which only adds to his attractiveness
to von Aschenbach. One of the child's
playmates kisses him, which leads von Aschenbach to quote from Xenophon (1860
bottom).
This way of interpreting the
boy's every move and appearance becomes more intense soon enough: "The
sight of this lively adolescent figure, seductive and chaste, lovely as a
tender young god, emerging from the depths of the sky and the sea with dripping
locks and escaping the clutches of the elements – it all gave rise to mythic
images" (1861 top). At this point,
what are we to make of language such as, "A paternal kindness, an
emotional attachment filled and moved his heart, the attachment that someone
who produces beauty at the cost of intellectual self-sacrifice feels toward
someone who naturally possesses beauty" (1861 middle)? This is still the language of Platonism, and
has about it the air of a rationalization of erotic interest. As the weather worsens, von Aschenbach
decides that the sickness attending upon the weather is too great to bear (1862
middle). He really must leave this
place. Von Aschenbach consumes his final
meal at the hotel, and just as he finishes, Tadzio walks by, prompting the
scholar to bless the boy under his breath (1863 bottom). And he thinks that's the end of it. But it really isn't since he finds
unacceptable that he has now twice been forced by his body's limitations to
abandon this place that seems so conducive to the formulation and flourishing
of ideals and spirit (1864 middle). But
a problem with his luggage solves the greater problem with his anguish over
having to leave Venice. Back to the
hotel he goes (1865 top). Von Aschenbach
is not entirely unaware that his difficulty in leaving had most of all to do
with the young boy he has taken such an interest in: "He felt the
excitement in his blood, the joy and pain in his soul, and recognized that it
was because of Tadzio that his departure had been so difficult" (1866
top).
Chapter 4 (1866-74)
The narrator's language
becomes more and more imbued with mythic quality to characterize the state of
von Aschenbach's mind. See the very
beginning of the chapter. Tadzio is now
the almost constant object of his attentions (1867 middle). Most of page 1868 is taken up with a detailed
description of the child's appearance as if he were a Greek statue. And then follows this effusion: "Image
and mirror! His eyes embraced the noble
figure there on the edge of the blue, and in a transport of delight he thought
his gaze was grasping beauty itself, the pure form of divine thought, the
universal and pure perfection that lives in the spirit and which here, graceful
and lovely, presented itself for worship in the form of a human likeness and
exemplar" (1868 bottom). See also
what is said about the way the sun "turns our attention from intellectual
to sensuous matters" (1868 bottom).
Will add notes on Chapter 5 if time permits....
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.